Smart City Data Ownership

By Guest Blogger: Melissa Cowin

Category:
Industry Trends

Smart%20City%20-%20Data%20Ownership.JPG

As cities become more intelligent with the ability to collect massive amounts of data, smart city data ownership is becoming a highly debated topic.  With the Internet of Things (IoT) and data from connected sensors, cities can provide better services that improve citizens’ lives.  All of the data being collected leaves citizens and government leaders wondering who owns the data, or who should own the data?  What are best practices for data ownership and data governance in smart cities today?  By better understanding what it means to have data ownership and establishing best practices in data governance, we can identify standards that can be adopted by cities everywhere.  Data ownership will enable cities to focus their attention on how decisions are made and how the public is engaged.

I will start by defining what data ownership means.  Techopedia states, “Data ownership is the act of having legal rights and complete control over a single piece or set of data elements. It defines and provides information about the rightful owner of data assets and the acquisition, use, and distribution policy implemented by the data owner”.

Ownership of data creates challenges that present themselves when working with a wide range of stakeholders and managing a citywide data infrastructure.  Cities are responsible for managing multiple sources of data that have to be protected, maintained, and used in a transparent way.  That is why Fybr believes that the client (the city) should always own the data.  The city then has the legal authority and power to control who shares, monetizes, and uses the data collected.

Looking into this topic a little deeper I asked Fybr’s CEO, Bob Glatz to weigh in on how Fybr approaches data ownership in regards client contracts.  Bob stated, “Fybr has always done the same deal with respect to data ownership.  The client always owns the data.  Fybr requests a limited license to use the data for internal business purposes.”  He goes on to define what ‘business purposes’ means.

“The definition of ‘Fybr’s business purposes’ may have been modified a bit from time to time, but in general we’ve tried to be very narrow.  What we’ve had in mind with respect to our internal business purpose is building data sets that answer the questions about how effectively our solution(s) work for clients with respect to various business cases. For example, we want to be able to say that if San Francisco raises rates by X it has Y impact on congestion.  So, it is really the use of our sensor data and the client’s modification of business processes and/or rules and the result of the business decisions and how those rule changes impact the client’s outcomes.  Fybr believes that the client should retain the right to use, and potentially monetize, the data for its stakeholder base.”

There are a number of ways for cities to approach data ownership and data governance, so I have developed a list of four steps to serve as a guide for government leaders.

1. Clearly define and be transparent about the use and ultimate goals of smart city data being collected.

What we know today about smart cities is there is not a “one size fits all“ solution due to the wide range of problems that can vary from city to city.  This is also true for data ownership as well as data governance.  You can start by identifying where you want to focus and address the problems by clearly defining the desired outcomes and manageable goals you wish to achieve with the data.  It is crucial to actively involve citizens in this process with local meetings, sharing information on social channels, as well as keeping your city’s website up-to-date.

2. Create a standard “data ownership” clause in procurement contracts to ensure access and ownership of all data produced under third party service contracts.

Cities need to have full ownership of their smart city data in order to ensure that they have full access and control.  Cities can identify and negotiate terms on a case by case basis when dealing with multiple stakeholders or develop a data trust as an alternative approach.  The Center for International Governance Innovation reports, “Data trusts are flexible and de facto global, meaning that they can be written in ways that create legally accountable governance structures.  It’s helpful to think about a data trust as a container — one that can hold assets, define governance, and manage liabilities.”  By taking ownership, the cities can define such terms that will have the greatest benefit for citizens and their community.

3. Develop a set of standard data principles for building new or improving upon existing IoT smart city platforms, services, and applications.

SmartImpact published a list of seven data principles that were developed in cooperation with a range of partners working with the city of Eindhoven, the Netherlands.  The principles include:

  • Privacy first
  • Open data and interfaces
  • Embrace open standards
  • Share where possible
  • Support modularity
  • Maintain security
  • Accept social responsibility

 

4. Build a holistic approach to data management that keeps your city protected from cybersecurity threats.

Managing “big data” can be a daunting task with a huge amount of responsibility and accountability.  It is important to build an approach to data management that works best for your city’s needs.  Historically, departments within city government have been siloed, but now with smart city data we can bridge the gaps in communication by establishing how that data is shared across all departments.  This will lead to better decision-making and gives you the tools required to maintain citizen privacy.  This approach also facilitates mitigating risks involved in cybersecurity.  We can think of this in the context of the “the human factor”, where might a hacker have the highest impact or disrupt city services?  By identifying the weaknesses you can build in security measures needed to ensure your city is protected now and in the future.   

smart city data Melissa%20Cowin.JPGBio: 

Melissa Cowin has extensive knowledge in the Internet of Things and smart cities market.  She is an experienced digital marketing professional with a Master of Business Administration from the University of Missouri-Saint Louis.

Contact: Phone:(636) 466-1635, Email: mcowin@fybr.com

 

About Fybr:

Fybr is a Smart City solutions provider who brings an intelligent, flexible platform to cities.  By focusing on lighting, parking, transportation, and water/environmental monitoring, Fybr provides communities with a solution that saves time and money while leading to a safer, more sustainable future for communities.

Learn More - www.fybr.com

Follow Fybr -

  • Twitter: @fybrtech 
  • Facebook: @fybrtech
  • LinkedIn: @fybr

Engage with ARC Advisory Group